Session @ Oracle Code San Francisco 2017

Here are the details for my talk @ Oracle Code (a track at JavaOne 2017) – Streaming Solutions for Real time problems (Stream Processing solutions using Apache Kafka, Kafka Streams and Redis)

Code (Github) – https://github.com/abhirockzz/accs-ehcs-stream-processing

Video

Slides

Cheers!

Advertisements
Posted in Distributed systems, Kafka | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Debezium test drive

Debezium is an open source, distributed change data capture system built on top of Apache Kafka. I tried it out and the project is available on Github

Setup

Details are in the README. It uses the Debezium tutorial as a background but the setup is very simple since it uses Docker Compose – one command (docker-compose up --build is all it takes to get going !

Components

  • MySQL – the database
  • Debezium – the CDC platform which tails MySQL binlog and pushes its logs to Kafka using its MySQL Kafka Connect connector
  • Consumer – its a Java EE application which consumes the (DB change) events from Kafka (topic), derserializes and parses it out and logs it

results.jpg

Cheers!

 

Posted in Distributed systems, Kafka | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Kafka & Websocket

For those who are interested in an example of Kafka working with the (Java EE) Websocket API, please check out this blog . There is an associated Github project as well

Cheers!

Posted in Distributed systems, Kafka | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Kafka producer and partitions

There are only a few possible ways to specify partitions while using the Kafka Producer API

  • Just specify it in the ProducerRecord itself
  • If key is not null, (by default) Kafka will hash your key and calculate the partition
  • If key is null, (by default) Kafka will round-robin b/w all the partitions (to load balance the data)
  • If not, just use a custom Partitioner

If interested, you can also check out the Kafka Partitioning blog

Cheers!

Posted in Distributed systems, Kafka | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Kafka Streams state stores…

This blog explores some common aspects of state stores in Kafka Streams…

Default state store

By default, Kafka Streams uses the RocksDB as it’s default state store

In-memory or persistent ?

This parameter of the state store is configurable. RocksDB can work in both modes and you can toggle this using the Stores factory API.

Once the StateStoreSupplier (api) is created it can be used in the (high level) Kafka Streams DSL API as well as the (low level) Processor API

Persistent storage medium

In case of persistent stores,  RocksDB (default) flushes the state store contents to the file system which can be specified by the StreamsConfig.STATE_DIR_CONFIG (this is not a compulsory parameter)

config.put(StreamsConfig.STATE_DIR_CONFIG, "my-state-store")

Notes

  • this state store is managed by Kafka Streams internally
  • it is also replicated to Kafka (for fault tolerance and elasticity) topic – this is log compacted topic and nothing but a changelog of the local state store contents (this is the default behavior which is also configurable using the enableLogging method or can be turned off using disableLogging 
  • it is possible to query these state stores using interactive queries feature

DSL vs Processor API

There are differences in the way DSL and Processor APIs handle state stores

Read-only vs writable stores

the DSL API restricts access to a read-only view of the state store (via ReadOnlyKeyValueStore) as opposed to the Processor API using which you can get access to a writable view which allows you to mutate the state store

Custom state stores

As of now (0.10.2) it’s not possible to plugin your custom state store implementation when using the DSL API. This means that with the DSL API, you are limited to the RocksDB based state store implementation. With the Processor API, it’s possible to configure a custom implementation (more on this below)

Custom state stores

As mentioned earlier, the Processor API gives you the freedom to use your own state store in a streams application. You can wrap your custom state store on top of the Kafka Streams API itself – by implementing the required interfaces like StateStore , StateStoreSupplier etc. More details here. Doing this will allow you to query the state store using standard Kafka Streams APIs

But …..

A custom state implementation might already have a query feature.. So does it still make sense to wrap it with the Kafka Streams interfaces/APIs ?

the answer is yes.. if…

you want to leverage the fault tolerance and elastic capabilities which are come for free (if configured using aforementioned parameters) with the Kafka Streams API – this is due to the changelog topic which is created in Kafka (corresponding to each state store). A custom state store implementation which is not based on the Streams API

  • will not interact with the Kafka broker to backup the state stores, as a result of which
  • task re-distribution during scale-in/scale-out will not be possible since the participating application nodes will not be able to synchronize the latest changes made to other local stores due to the lack of a global checkpoint

Note that this problem can be circumvented with the help of an inherently distributed state store implementation which all the stream processing application instances can access

Other stuff

Cheers!

Posted in Distributed systems, Kafka | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Docker-ized Kafka Streams applications

Here is another example of a Kafka Streams based application.. this time, it’s about running it in Docker containers – spawn more containers to distribute the processing load. More details in the README

docker-kafka

Cheers!

Posted in Distributed systems, Kafka | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Kafka Streams based application

A Kafka Streams sample application is available on Github… This is a microservice (packaged in form of an Uber JAR) which uses the Kafka Streams Processor (low level) API to calculate the Cumulative Moving Average of the CPU metrics of each machine in a distributed manner

  • A producer application continuously emits CPU usage metrics into a Kafka topic (cpu-metrics-topic) and consumer application (instances) do the computation
  • Consumers can be horizontally scaled – the processing work is distributed amongst many nodes and the process is elastic and flexible thanks to Kafka Streams (and the fact that it leverages Kafka for fault tolerance etc.)
  • Each instance has its own (local) state for the calculated average. A custom REST API has been (using Jersey JAX-RS implementation) to tap into this state and provide a unified view of the entire system (moving averages of CPU usage of all machines)

….. more in the project README

Cheers!

Posted in Distributed systems, Kafka | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Tip: ClassCastException in Kafka Streams reducer

If you use the groupByKey function on a KStream without specifying a Serdes, the (one configured in the StreamsConfig will be used by default e.g. in the below snippet, it’s Serdes.String(). As a result, you will face a ClassCastExcpetion in case

  • you execute an operation (e.g. mapValues)  which changes the data type of the key or value, and
  • do not specify the corresponding Serdes for the data type while execuing subsequent operations (e.g. groupByKey)

Quick Tip

The solution is to use the appropriate Serdes (in the below example, Serdes.Double() is explicitly specified)

Cheers!

Posted in Distributed systems, Kafka | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Microservices messaging on Oracle Cloud using Apache Kafka

Here is a blog I posted on the Oracle Cloud Developer Solutions portal. This is the first of a two-part series which shows asynchronous messaging b/w microservices with the help of a simple example (application)

high-level-arch.jpg

Technical components

Oracle Cloud

Open source

  • Apache Kafka: scalable pub-sub message hub
  • Jersey: Used to implement REST and SSE services. Uses Grizzly as a (pluggable) runtime/container

Cheers!

Posted in Distributed systems, Kafka | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Apache Curator: distributed (try) locks

Apache Curator provides different types of distributed locks such as a basic one, re-entrant lock, re-entrant read write lock etc. In this blog we look at one such lock implementation (an InterProcessMutex )

  • its API
  • how it simulates the tryLock feature in Java Lock
  • walk through sample code

Code available on Github

curator-logo

Apache Curator: the keeper for Zookeeper

InterProcessMutex API

It has a simple API where the primary components are

  • the constructor itself: how to instantiate a distributed lock
  • acquire the lock
  • relinquish (release) the lock

Prior to entering a critical section, an application or process would need to obtain a lock in order to ensure that it is the only one executing that piece of logic

Block for Lock

What’s important to understand is that the acquire method blocks until the lock is available. This has some important implications for multiple processes which are competing for this lock

  • Only one will succeed – this is obvious
  • Since acquire method blocks, the other processes will queue up
  • The queuing up will happen in a fair manner (as per implementation) i.e. the process which calledacquire first (as per Zookeeper, not as per the application) will be the next in queue to get the lock once it’s released by the process which actually has the lock

Depending upon your use case, you might or might not want the queuing effect. For example

  • A node in your application gets the lock, finish a part of the job (and save it state to a shared location like a DB) and release the lock. You might want that the other node in that the application to continue processing from where the previous node left – using acquire to let the nodes wait in a queue makes sense
  • If you have a scheduled timer distributed across multiple nodes in your cluster and need it to be executed by one node at a time, then you might want to use the overloaded form of acquire method. This will avoid queing up effect of processes – its something wich you would not want since the timer is already pre-configured to fire after certain intervals

Distributed try lock

Just like the tryLock method in Java’s Lock, the InterProcessMutex provides an overloaded version of acquire which accepts a time out. It does not block – all it does is the following

  • returns true if the lock is obtained within the stipulated time out
  • returns false i.e. it gives up if the lock is not available and the time out is breached

Code walk through

Details in the Github project README

Further reading

Cheers!

Posted in Curator, Distributed systems, Zookeeper | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment